Can we have a faq in the wiki enumerating all the possible scenarios and
solutions?

On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 1:37 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 3/9/08, djo.mos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > This simply looks great ! I think this should make it into the core
> Wicket
> >  >  behaviors as the componenet focus is quite useful.
> >  >
> >
> >  Me too!  That's why I submitted:
> >
> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1404
> >
> >  I was pretty surprised something didn't exist for this already.  I
> >  don't mean any offense by that at all.  It's just that it seems like
> >  every time I think to myself "there should be a way to do x with
> >  Wicket", there's already something for that!  This Wicket stuff is
> >  pretty cool!
>
> i dont think something like this should go into core. it seems pretty
> clear from this thread that there are very many ways to do this and
> each project will use their own. what you have proposed seems trivial
> to construct, so for projects that want to use it its a nobrainer. i
> think things that go into core should at least satisfy the majority of
> common usecases or be at least of moderate complexity. if we start
> putting every trivial thing like this into core we will end up with a
> huge surface area - at which point you have to start thinking of the
> find/build tradeoff - is it easier to find something that does what i
> want in core or simply roll my own which will only take fifteen
> minutes...
>
> now, for example, if this behavior was meant to be attached to a form
> and would set focus on the first component that is not valid...
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to