Hi Jeremy, No problem at all, and thanks a lot for reviewing that....
Please feel free, let me know if you need any action from me on that subject. Carl Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote: > > Carl, > Would you mind if I made a few minor changes to your pom files to make > this project conform to the standards of the wicketstuff-core projects? > Things I noticed are: > > - yav-parent/yav/pom.xml - artifact ID must be "yav" rather than > "wicketstuff-yav" > - yav-parent/yav-examples/pom.xml - artifact ID must be "yav-examples" > rather than "wicketstuff-yav-examples" > - add yav-parent to the modules list in wicketstuff-core/pom.xml > > Thank you, > > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:35 AM, cazoury <carl.azo...@zenika.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I have finally added the Wicket Yav Integration into the trunk of >> wicketstuff-core. >> >> There is an exemple application provided to test the actual Wicket rules >> that has been converted to Yav.... >> >> Every feedback is the most welcome and contribution also. >> >> It is a first step, but we can make it evolve maybe as Cemal suggested to >> include more advanced validation (like apache validator or Hibernate >> Validator....) >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Nino Martinez-2 wrote: >> > >> > ok you should be in... >> > >> > We take jira and CI later.. Ok? >> > >> > Happy new year >> > >> > cazoury wrote: >> >> Thank you every one for your answers and interests on the project. >> >> >> >> I will be very happy for the project to go on Wicketstuff repo. >> >> >> >> My nick on sourceforge is : cazoury, I will post that on the dev list. >> >> >> >> Hopefully everything will be checked in before the end of the week. >> >> >> >> >> >>> In terms of the actual validation, have you given any thought yet to >> how >> >>> this can be done as DRY as >> >>> possible wrt respecifying (equivalent/similar) validation at various >> >>> layers including Wicket's, the ORM's, >> >>> in business rules etc? >> >>> >> >> >> >> for the DRY principle we only take into account the validators defined >> on >> >> the form components. Nothing else for the moment. They are some >> >> Validators >> >> in Wicket that are not available in YAV and the contrary. Maybe a next >> >> step >> >> will be to add them on the YAV side so all the default Wicket >> validators >> >> can >> >> be taken into account. >> >> >> >> But first, the checkin of the code :) >> >> >> >> Nino Martinez-2 wrote: >> >> >> >>> I like to keep my contributions in wicketstuff repo, and I think us >> >>> wicketstuffers would be happy to have your project there .. But no >> >>> matter what I think you should contribute the stuff you've done :) >> >>> >> >>> So if you want, just post your sourceforge nick to the dev list to >> get >> >>> write permissions.. And I think your project should go into >> wicketstuff >> >>> core, but jeremy can fill you in on that :) >> >>> >> >>> cazoury wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> We have been working on a small project to integrate >> >>>> http://yav.sourceforge.net/ YAV library with Wicket. It is >> javascript >> >>>> validation purely on the client side. YAV has a LGPL licence and is >> a >> >>>> sourceforge project. >> >>>> >> >>>> I know that we can use an Ajax Behavior to validate the form with >> the >> >>>> validators present on the server side, but this is to respond to one >> of >> >>>> our >> >>>> client needs and also to illustrate how easy it is to integrate an >> >>>> existing >> >>>> javascript library with Wicket. >> >>>> >> >>>> It has also some nice features like using in the javascript >> validation >> >>>> the >> >>>> same messages as the ones used by the Wicket application (default >> >>>> messages >> >>>> and user defined messages) >> >>>> >> >>>> We would like to contribute, if possible, this code (wicket-contrib >> / >> >>>> wicket-stuff) if people finds this interesting. But I am not sure >> what >> >>>> are >> >>>> the different steps for that. >> >>>> >> >>>> We where thinking making it a sourceforge or googlecode project, >> maybe >> >>>> it >> >>>> is >> >>>> the first step and then I could post the link to it on this forum. >> >>>> >> >>>> Everyone enjoy the last day(s) of this year :) >> >>>> >> >>>> Carl Azoury >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-to-Wicket---Client-side-form-validation-tp21219136p21527885.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-to-Wicket---Client-side-form-validation-tp21219136p21539881.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
