Jeremy, Thanks. If the problem can no longer be replicated (OK here now but I haven't checked if Carl is still experiencing this) I assume that the parent POMs are in good shape.
Regards - Cemal http://www.jWeekend.co.uk jWeekend Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote: > > Cemal, > I didn't have much time to look into it, but didn't see anything real > obvious in any of the yav poms. Do you know what's causing the > dependency? > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16 AM, jWeekend > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Jeremy, >> >> Since you're digging around in there and if what you wanted to change >> doesn't already fix this, the yav and yav-examples project have >> unnecessary >> dependencies on jmxtools and jms jars (probably from some parent/grand >> parent POM). >> >> Regards - Cemal >> http://jWeekende.co.uk jWeekend >> >> >> >> Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote: >> > >> > Carl, >> > Would you mind if I made a few minor changes to your pom files to >> make >> > this project conform to the standards of the wicketstuff-core projects? >> > Things I noticed are: >> > >> > - yav-parent/yav/pom.xml - artifact ID must be "yav" rather than >> > "wicketstuff-yav" >> > - yav-parent/yav-examples/pom.xml - artifact ID must be "yav-examples" >> > rather than "wicketstuff-yav-examples" >> > - add yav-parent to the modules list in wicketstuff-core/pom.xml >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jeremy Thomerson >> > http://www.wickettraining.com >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:35 AM, cazoury <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have finally added the Wicket Yav Integration into the trunk of >> >> wicketstuff-core. >> >> >> >> There is an exemple application provided to test the actual Wicket >> rules >> >> that has been converted to Yav.... >> >> >> >> Every feedback is the most welcome and contribution also. >> >> >> >> It is a first step, but we can make it evolve maybe as Cemal suggested >> to >> >> include more advanced validation (like apache validator or Hibernate >> >> Validator....) >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Nino Martinez-2 wrote: >> >> > >> >> > ok you should be in... >> >> > >> >> > We take jira and CI later.. Ok? >> >> > >> >> > Happy new year >> >> > >> >> > cazoury wrote: >> >> >> Thank you every one for your answers and interests on the project. >> >> >> >> >> >> I will be very happy for the project to go on Wicketstuff repo. >> >> >> >> >> >> My nick on sourceforge is : cazoury, I will post that on the dev >> list. >> >> >> >> >> >> Hopefully everything will be checked in before the end of the week. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> In terms of the actual validation, have you given any thought yet >> to >> >> how >> >> >>> this can be done as DRY as >> >> >>> possible wrt respecifying (equivalent/similar) validation at >> various >> >> >>> layers including Wicket's, the ORM's, >> >> >>> in business rules etc? >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> for the DRY principle we only take into account the validators >> defined >> >> on >> >> >> the form components. Nothing else for the moment. They are some >> >> >> Validators >> >> >> in Wicket that are not available in YAV and the contrary. Maybe a >> next >> >> >> step >> >> >> will be to add them on the YAV side so all the default Wicket >> >> validators >> >> >> can >> >> >> be taken into account. >> >> >> >> >> >> But first, the checkin of the code :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Nino Martinez-2 wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> I like to keep my contributions in wicketstuff repo, and I think >> us >> >> >>> wicketstuffers would be happy to have your project there .. But no >> >> >>> matter what I think you should contribute the stuff you've done :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> So if you want, just post your sourceforge nick to the dev list to >> >> get >> >> >>> write permissions.. And I think your project should go into >> >> wicketstuff >> >> >>> core, but jeremy can fill you in on that :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> cazoury wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Hi, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We have been working on a small project to integrate >> >> >>>> http://yav.sourceforge.net/ YAV library with Wicket. It is >> >> javascript >> >> >>>> validation purely on the client side. YAV has a LGPL licence and >> is > >> >> a >> >> >>>> sourceforge project. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I know that we can use an Ajax Behavior to validate the form with >> >> the >> >> >>>> validators present on the server side, but this is to respond to >> one >> >> of >> >> >>>> our >> >> >>>> client needs and also to illustrate how easy it is to integrate >> an >> >> >>>> existing >> >> >>>> javascript library with Wicket. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> It has also some nice features like using in the javascript >> >> validation >> >> >>>> the >> >> >>>> same messages as the ones used by the Wicket application (default >> >> >>>> messages >> >> >>>> and user defined messages) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We would like to contribute, if possible, this code >> (wicket-contrib >> >> / >> >> >>>> wicket-stuff) if people finds this interesting. But I am not sure >> >> what >> >> >>>> are >> >> >>>> the different steps for that. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We where thinking making it a sourceforge or googlecode project, >> >> maybe >> >> >>>> it >> >> >>>> is >> >> >>>> the first step and then I could post the link to it on this >> forum. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Everyone enjoy the last day(s) of this year :) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Carl Azoury >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-to-Wicket---Client-side-form-validation-tp21219136p21527885.html >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-to-Wicket---Client-side-form-validation-tp21219136p21547407.html >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-to-Wicket---Client-side-form-validation-tp21219136p21793694.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
