If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a problem to take over the name.
If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans? Or, in wicketstuff-core, we have removed the "wicket-" from all names because it was redundant. Make your groupId "org.wicketstuff" and your artifactId "webbeans". -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Leszek Gawron <[email protected]> wrote: > James Carman wrote: > >> All, >> >> I've run into a problem. I'd like to start up a project to integrate >> the new WebBeans Specification (JSR-299) based on the Apache >> OpenWebBeans project >> (http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html) >> in the Apache Incubator. Unfortunately, there already exists a >> project called wicketwebbeans. It's not an "official" Wicket project, >> but I don't want to step on anyone's toes. What would you folks >> suggest here? The name of the spec is WebBeans, so the name >> wicket-webbeans (the packages is javax.webbeans) does fit. The other >> project's actual name is wicketwebbeans, so it's not an exact match, >> but it's close enough to cause some confusion. >> > > you could call it wicket-jsr299, but that might be a little bit too cryptic > for some users... > > Is wicketwebbeans project active currently? It looks like it's still using > wicket 1.3... > > -- > Leszek Gawron > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
