On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:01 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a > problem to take over the name. > > If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans? > > Or, in wicketstuff-core, we have removed the "wicket-" from all names > because it was redundant. Make your groupId "org.wicketstuff" and your > artifactId "webbeans". Just for consideration: this would create a jar like "webbeans-1.4.jar" which would be confusing...
Cheers, Martin > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Leszek Gawron <lgaw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > James Carman wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> I've run into a problem. I'd like to start up a project to integrate > >> the new WebBeans Specification (JSR-299) based on the Apache > >> OpenWebBeans project > >> (http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html) > >> in the Apache Incubator. Unfortunately, there already exists a > >> project called wicketwebbeans. It's not an "official" Wicket project, > >> but I don't want to step on anyone's toes. What would you folks > >> suggest here? The name of the spec is WebBeans, so the name > >> wicket-webbeans (the packages is javax.webbeans) does fit. The other > >> project's actual name is wicketwebbeans, so it's not an exact match, > >> but it's close enough to cause some confusion. > >> > > > > you could call it wicket-jsr299, but that might be a little bit too cryptic > > for some users... > > > > Is wicketwebbeans project active currently? It looks like it's still using > > wicket 1.3... > > > > -- > > Leszek Gawron > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
