ya, most bank applications are front end applications that simply require that input be captured. and some minor validations. Of course, there would be two modes, offline and online mode.
Would really be nice to implement this one. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:34 PM, James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > ahhhhh, then proceed! :) > > It's an interesting idea. Don't know how it would work, though. > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Carlo Camerino <cmcamer...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > it's not for the public to use. but rather for people within the banks. > > internal applications. sometimes central connection is not available. > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:37 PM, James Carman > > <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > > > >> Are you sure a banking application would be the right place for a > >> gears-based implementation? Wouldn't it be kinda important to make > >> sure the main server knows where everything is, when money is > >> concerned? > >> > >> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Carlo Camerino <cmcamer...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Is there any project which has Wicket And Google Gears Integration? > >> > Wicket has really done a lot of us in speeding up development time. > >> Coming > >> > from a struts we saw the power of Wicket in terms its reusability and > >> i've > >> > noticed that > >> > wicket already did most of the tasks that we would have to manually do > >> using > >> > struts application, like session timeouts, redirects, etc.... > >> > > >> > One of our main concerns however are that clients > >> > are asking for our applications to be available even if the network is > >> down > >> > or if the central server is down.. > >> > Currently we implemented our applications in a distributed fashion > >> wherein > >> > every branch ( Remote Location) has its own server. > >> > However, this has implications of cost and administration issues. > >> > However, if offline mode is enabled we can just begin syncing right. > >> > > >> > I think that Wicket WIth Google Gears Application will make it even > >> better . > >> > > >> > > >> > I think this is really a plus when it comes to marketing it to > customers. > >> > Most of the applications that we create our banking applications and > any > >> > downtime is costing our clients. > >> > > >> > Hopefully we can also do this to offload the central servers and to > put > >> > processing into client machines. > >> > > >> > One large problem I see though is that most code wil have to be moved > to > >> the > >> > Browser Layer. > >> > I'm thinking of how to create a wicket application which is mostly run > by > >> > java classes work on the client side. > >> > Looks as if there will be a lot of code changes... > >> > I'm not really sure if it would be a totally different programming > model. > >> > > >> > Anyone out there tried to integrate Gears And Wicket > >> > > >> > Carlo > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
