nah. you go ahead. the AutoComponentSource sounds vary vague, you will need to elaborate it.
-igor On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:58 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > on dev list? You wanna start it? > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> can we fork this into another thread? >> >> -igor >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, James Carman >> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: >>> Could we introduce the concept of an AutoComponentSource or something, >>> perhaps? A page/component could potentially have multiple? >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: >>>> +1 on rethinking the auto* stuff together with the proposed queueing. >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>> Am 09.11.2010 um 21:17 schrieb Igor Vaynberg: >>>> >>>>> i wonder if queuing can actually replace icomponentresolver and >>>>> auto-adding. i wonder if after onbeforerender we can do what unqueing >>>>> does now, parse the markup, find any missing components, and insert >>>>> them. autocomponents and autoadd() is something ive always disliked >>>>> because it doesnt work for anything that needs to stick around across >>>>> requests. >>>>> >>>>> -igor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> and that is only because i cant do >>>>>> >>>>>> component.setAuto(false) >>>>>> >>>>>> right after i call autoAdd() >>>>>> >>>>>> else it would just stay there :) >>>>>> >>>>>> and this is then only done to resolve it once with the first render... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 20:03, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> it still wont work for a lot of usecases that require proper >>>>>>> hierarchy. like a form trying to find form submitting component, etc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -igor >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> ok a sample that it also works in with the right parent: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> public class HelloWorld extends WebPage implements IComponentResolver { >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> final Label label; >>>>>>>> public HelloWorld() >>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>> label = new Label("label", new Model<String>() >>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>> �...@override >>>>>>>> public String getObject() { >>>>>>>> return "my label: " + >>>>>>>> label.isEnabledInHierarchy(); >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> }); >>>>>>>> add(new WebMarkupContainer("body").setEnabled(false)); >>>>>>>> add(label); >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> public boolean resolve(MarkupContainer container, >>>>>>>> MarkupStream markupStream, ComponentTag tag) { >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Component component = get(tag.getId()); >>>>>>>> if (component != null) >>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>> container.autoAdd(component, markupStream); >>>>>>>> return true; >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> return false; >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> you will see that it is disabled... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:37, Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> textfield.isEnabledInHierachy() will then ofcourse not get to the >>>>>>>>> parent it is on. >>>>>>>>> because its parent is the webpage not the body markupcontainer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So no this will not resolver from the child to the parent, only the >>>>>>>>> parent to the child. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:30, Martin Makundi >>>>>>>>> <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> How will it work if I call get("body").setEnabled(false); and if >>>>>>>>>> label >>>>>>>>>> was a textfield? Would the textfield be still enabled? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/9 Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> no ofcourse not >>>>>>>>>>> The label will then be gone because the body is gone. >>>>>>>>>>> so the output will be this >>>>>>>>>>> <html> >>>>>>>>>>> </html> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> when the body container is not visible >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> if the label is not visible: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <html> >>>>>>>>>>> <body> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> </body> >>>>>>>>>>> </html> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> this solution you just can throw everything in the panel or webpage >>>>>>>>>>> that is the IComponentResolver for all its childs... >>>>>>>>>>> Just look at how the code works.. >>>>>>>>>>> IF a component can't be found on its own parent the >>>>>>>>>>> ComponentResolver >>>>>>>>>>> will ask all the parents which can be IComponentResolver to render >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> child.. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:04, Martin Makundi >>>>>>>>>>> <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> This does not really nest the components logically, does it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you set get("body").setVisible(false) will the label remain >>>>>>>>>>>> visible? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/11/9 Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you >>>>>>>>>>>>> really need it? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> public class HelloWorld extends WebPage implements >>>>>>>>>>>>> IComponentResolver { >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> public HelloWorld() >>>>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>>>> add(new WebMarkupContainer("body")); >>>>>>>>>>>>> add(new Label("label","my label")); >>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> public boolean resolve(MarkupContainer container, >>>>>>>>>>>>> MarkupStream markupStream, ComponentTag >>>>>>>>>>>>> tag) { >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Component component = get(tag.getId()); >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (component != null) >>>>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>>>> component.render(markupStream); >>>>>>>>>>>>> return true; >>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>> return false; >>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <body wicket:id="body"> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <span wicket:id="label"></span> >>>>>>>>>>>>> </body> >>>>>>>>>>>>> </html> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 16:29, Frank Silbermann >>>>>>>>>>>>> <frank.silberm...@fedex.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Progress is made by people who have understanding, not by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not in a position to make suggestions about extending >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you don't yet understand how to use the powers it already has. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:23 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: users@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So instead of asking, "How can we make Wicket different so that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem will go away?" the proper question to try first is, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "What is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket way of solving my problem?" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not how proggress is made... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org