Most of the things you want to do with jQuery, you don't need a library for.
I totally agree with Maarten Bruno Borges www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 "The glory of great men should always be measured by the means they have used to acquire it." - Francois de La Rochefoucauld On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Maarten Billemont <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless WiQuery has matured a *lot* lately and the code has been cleaned up > significantly, I can't recommend it, personally. > > Writing what should be JavaScript in your wicket Java code is quite > out-of-place, and generally all you need to do is place your code where it > belongs, in a .js or your markup. > > There may be some odd cases here or there where tighter integration of > jQuery and Wicket can be beneficial, but those can usually be resolved some > other way. > > I don't have enough experience or knowledge of the framework to cast a > final vote though, all I'm saying is: beware of the quality of this > library's code and make sure you actually need it first (I want to do jQuery > stuff in my Wicket application is generally not reason enough). > > On 06 Apr 2011, at 11:09, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We are thinking of using wiquery for a project. We are interested in the > experiences of people using it. Does wiquery work in the major browsers > (IE7, IE8, IE9, FF3 and Chrome)? Are there any complications when different > versions of jquery are used on other places in the HTML? What is the version > of Wicket you used it? > > > > Please share your experiences. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Haiko van der Schaaf > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
