"- did not yet try out Ajax with Wicket, so I have no opinion on that "
In my opinion, ajax is the killer feature. Give it a try. Josh. On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:07 PM, heikki <tropic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have tried out the Wicket framework and many things I really like about > it. > Some observations: > > > - Wicket changes drastically between versions, and even between minor > versions / release candidates, things suddenly disappear from the API, > sometimes without having been flagged as deprecated ; > > - as a result, many times the example code you find on the web or in books > like 'Wicket in Action' does no longer work as is > > - the Javadoc of the source is quite OK for some classes, but for the great > majority any textual explanations there are either sparse or absent > > - luckily the mailing list is nothing short of fantastic ! > > - I agree that it is rather too easy for Wicket to make things stateful, > when you don't want it > > - and in my opinion the stuff you need to do to achieve "normal" URLs (no > ?, > no version number, no nothing) is just a pain. *Every* URL, for stateless > or > stateless pages or whatever, should be "normal", otherwise it is just not > acceptable -- users never want to see those complicated-looking URLs under > any circumstance > > - did not yet try out Ajax with Wicket, so I have no opinion on that > > Just my 2¢. In all, a great framework that is much easier to use than e.g. > things based on JSP. Keep up the good work, guys ! > > Kind regards > Heikki Doeleman > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-is-a-Flawed-Framework-tp4080411p4082988.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
