Sorry for being stubborn but having '?wicket:interface=:0:1:::' in the
url means that this is Wicket pre-1.5 ;-)

I guess Sven will join this conversation later today and explain in
more details.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin
> with all my respect but their build script uses
>
>                 <dependency>
>                         <groupId>org.apache.wicket</groupId>
>                         <artifactId>wicket-core</artifactId>
>                         <version>${wicket.version}</version>
>                 </dependency>
>
> ${wicket.version} derived from parent pom where
> <wicket.version>1.5.0</wicket.version>
>
> So,
> 1. no stateless form
> 2. it is 1.5
> 3. it's pretty easy to ensure yourself just by looking into code
> http://code.google.com/p/wicket-tree/wiki/RunningExamples It even
> can't be compiled under 1.4
>
> Anyway: what does your answer has to do with my question? One more
> time: how that example manage not to increase page version shown in
> url on every tree node selection?
> thanks
>
>
> On 21 August 2012 14:39, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> The deployed examples use Wicket 1.4.
>>
>> http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/?wicket:interface=:0:1:::
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> They are using
>>> Form<Void> form = new Form<Void>("form");
>>>
>>> and still no version in url on round-trips. Also, FilterForm from
>>> Wicket API doesn't extends StatelessForm while your answer states that
>>> must be the case.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 August 2012 14:20, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Use StatelessForm instead.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Alex Shubert <alex.shub...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Recently I found wicket tree control
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wicket-tree.appspot.com/nested
>>>>>
>>>>>  and one there is a thing I can't understand: while the page contains
>>>>> Form it looks like not versioned. I mean there are no version number
>>>>> in a url.
>>>>> How does it work then? Is there any clear way to build pages
>>>>> containing Form without explicit version number in url except some
>>>>> black magic involved ( modified MountedMapper )
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>> Alexandr
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>> jWeekend
>>>> Training, Consulting, Development
>>>> http://jWeekend.com
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Alexandr
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Grigorov
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Alexandr
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>



-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to