Hi, On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 for 4A > > and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing > arm.. > I can't read XWiki in it.. > I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had people from outside the project look at the 16 logo and they weren't able to read "XWiki" in it. I'm afraid that while stylistically interesting, this logo is too unreadable for mainstream use - unless we don't expect anyone to understand the XWiki logo that is. I'm feeling pretty close to giving it a -1 too if its readability isn't improved. I know I might be going against the flow here but we're about to make a significant choice here and I don't want us to regret it. Any thoughts? Guillaume > Ludovic > > Le 12/04/10 16:44, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit : > > On 04/12/2010 04:30 PM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote: >> >> >>> My corrected vote is +1 for 12A. >>> >>> >> 12A has been retired and is no longer a valid option. Please choose >> another one. >> >> >> > > > -- > Ludovic Dubost > Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ > XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com > Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > -- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki SAS Skype: wikibc Twitter: glerouge http://guillaumelerouge.com/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
