On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost<ludo...@xwiki.com> wrote: > >> >> +1 for 4A >> >> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >> arm.. >> I can't read XWiki in it.. >> > > I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had > people from outside the project look at the 16 logo and they weren't able to > read "XWiki" in it. I'm afraid that while stylistically interesting, this > logo is too unreadable for mainstream use - unless we don't expect anyone to > understand the XWiki logo that is. > > I'm feeling pretty close to giving it a -1 too if its readability isn't > improved. I know I might be going against the flow here but we're about to > make a significant choice here and I don't want us to regret it. > > Any thoughts?
Maybe it would be good for people to propose improved versions, but it will be hard to improve readability while also maintaining the style/logo idea. One option would be to keep just the X from the logo, and use a normal font for writing the actual product name (something like 4 does with the pencils). > Guillaume > > >> Ludovic >> >> Le 12/04/10 16:44, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit : >> >> On 04/12/2010 04:30 PM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote: >>> >>> >>>> My corrected vote is +1 for 12A. >>>> >>>> >>> 12A has been retired and is no longer a valid option. Please choose >>> another one. >>> -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
