Hey guys, great effort! I think people in few other communities will be very happy with it i.e [1] and [2].
Is there an issue that tracks current status or something like that? Does anyone have concrete plans to work on it in this/next release? Sorry if I have missed that out. And please, keep up a good work! -- Alex 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2269 2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/examples/spark#known-issues-with-zeppelin On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 06:54 Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Felix, > Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - not-all > - interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install them if > users want to use them. > > Moon, > I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by default as it > makes users confused less. But if we want to add more interpreters, I think > mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper criteria. > > Jeff, > Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use > install-interpreter.sh. > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. As I >> would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing and how >> to install them. >> >> >> >> moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道： >> >>> Following is last discussion related to release package size. >>> >>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8c6df941a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E >>> >>> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every >>> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no >>> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we make a >>> decision. >>> >>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> moon >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to use to >>>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately. >>>> >>>> _____________________________ >>>> From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and >>>> releasing Zeppelin >>>> To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org> >>>> >>> Cc: <users@zeppelin.apache.org> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all interpreters >>>> into >>>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside >>>> it. If >>>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default >>>> release package, they can use that script to install specific one. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released >>>> separately? >>>> > >>>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release pipeline? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _____________________________ >>>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com >>>> <jongy...@gmail.com>>> >>>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM >>>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and >>>> > releasing Zeppelin >>>> >>> > To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org >>>> <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>>, < >>>> >>> >>>> > users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org >>>> <users@zeppelin.apache.org>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Hi dev and users, >>>> > >>>> >>> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is being >>>> >>> >>>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I like this >>>> kind >>>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which interpreters we >>>> will >>>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to the >>>> package we >>>> > release. >>>> > >>>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option because >>>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was good at >>>> the >>>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the size >>>> because >>>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to reduce >>>> the >>>> > package size by reducing default packages. >>>> > >>>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some criteria >>>> including >>>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we can adapt >>>> same >>>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin. >>>> > >>>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community is the >>>> most >>>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it, >>>> please >>>> > feel free to talk about it. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Jongyoul Lee >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>> > http://madeng.net >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >>>> http://madeng.net >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > -- > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > http://madeng.net >
