I believe it's a good idea to select which interpreters to keep in the "default release", should we track this through JIRA?
2017-06-11 17:05 GMT+02:00 Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com>: > Thanks, Alex. > > I left comments we started to discuss on it recently. > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> great effort! I think people in few other communities will be very happy >> with it i.e [1] and [2]. >> >> Is there an issue that tracks current status or something like that? Does >> anyone have concrete plans to work on it in this/next release? >> >> Sorry if I have missed that out. And please, keep up a good work! >> >> >> -- >> >> Alex >> >> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2269 >> 2. >> https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/example >> s/spark#known-issues-with-zeppelin >> >> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 06:54 Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Felix, >> > Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - >> not-all >> > - interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install them >> if >> > users want to use them. >> > >> > Moon, >> > I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by default as >> it >> > makes users confused less. But if we want to add more interpreters, I >> think >> > mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper criteria. >> > >> > Jeff, >> > Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use >> > install-interpreter.sh. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. >> As I >> >> would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing and >> how >> >> to install them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道： >> >> >> >>> Following is last discussion related to release package size. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8 >> c6df941a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E >> >>> >> >>> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every >> >>> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no >> >>> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we >> make a >> >>> decision. >> >>> >> >>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> moon >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung < >> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to use >> to >> >>>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately. >> >>>> >> >>>> _____________________________ >> >>>> From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> >> >>>> >> >>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM >> >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building >> and >> >>>> releasing Zeppelin >> >>>> To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org> >> >>>> >> >>> Cc: <users@zeppelin.apache.org> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all >> interpreters >> >>>> into >> >>>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside >> >>>> it. If >> >>>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default >> >>>> release package, they can use that script to install specific one. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung < >> felixcheun...@hotmail.com >> >>>> > >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released >> >>>> separately? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release >> pipeline? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > _____________________________ >> >>>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com >> >>>> <jongy...@gmail.com>>> >> >>>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM >> >>>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and >> >>>> > releasing Zeppelin >> >>>> >> >>> > To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org >> >>>> <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>>, < >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> > users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org >> >>>> <users@zeppelin.apache.org>>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Hi dev and users, >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is being >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I like >> this >> >>>> kind >> >>>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which interpreters >> we >> >>>> will >> >>>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to the >> >>>> package we >> >>>> > release. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option because >> >>>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was good >> at >> >>>> the >> >>>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the size >> >>>> because >> >>>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to >> reduce >> >>>> the >> >>>> > package size by reducing default packages. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some criteria >> >>>> including >> >>>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we can >> adapt >> >>>> same >> >>>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community is the >> >>>> most >> >>>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it, >> >>>> please >> >>>> > feel free to talk about it. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Thanks, >> >>>> > Jongyoul Lee >> >>>> > >> >>>> > -- >> >>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >> >>>> > http://madeng.net >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >> >>>> http://madeng.net >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >> > http://madeng.net >> > >> > > > > -- > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > http://madeng.net >
