Thanks, Alex. I left comments we started to discuss on it recently.
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Alexander Bezzubov <b...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey guys, > > great effort! I think people in few other communities will be very happy > with it i.e [1] and [2]. > > Is there an issue that tracks current status or something like that? Does > anyone have concrete plans to work on it in this/next release? > > Sorry if I have missed that out. And please, keep up a good work! > > > -- > > Alex > > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2269 > 2. > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/ > examples/spark#known-issues-with-zeppelin > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 06:54 Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Felix, > > Yes, I said a bit confused. I want to release Zeppelin with some - > not-all > > - interpreters, but deploy all interpreters into maven to install them if > > users want to use them. > > > > Moon, > > I think it's the best to fit the list as same as homepage by default as > it > > makes users confused less. But if we want to add more interpreters, I > think > > mailing questions and related issues are one of the proper criteria. > > > > Jeff, > > Agreed. We already had a menu but it just shows how to use > > install-interpreter.sh. > > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> If possible, we need to integrate the install script in zeppelin UI. As > I > >> would expect many users would ask why some interpreter is missing and > how > >> to install them. > >> > >> > >> > >> moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年6月5日周一 上午2:06写道： > >> > >>> Following is last discussion related to release package size. > >>> > >>> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/69f606409790d7ba11422e8c6df941 > a75c5dfae0aca63eccf2f840bf@%3Cusers.zeppelin.apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> at this time, we have discussed about having bin-all (every > >>> interpreters), bin-min (selected interpreters), bin-netinst (no > >>> interpreters) package but didn't conclude the criteria and how we make > a > >>> decision. > >>> > >>> Jongyoul, do you have any idea about criteria? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> moon > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM Felix Cheung < > felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sure - I think it will be important to discuss what criteria to use to > >>>> decide what is included vs what will be released separately. > >>>> > >>>> _____________________________ > >>>> From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 9:47 AM > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building > and > >>>> releasing Zeppelin > >>>> To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org> > >>>> > >>> Cc: <users@zeppelin.apache.org> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> It means we release with some interpreters and deploy all interpreters > >>>> into > >>>> maven separately. We already had a install-interpreter script inside > >>>> it. If > >>>> someone wants to install specific interpreter not included in default > >>>> release package, they can use that script to install specific one. > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Felix Cheung < > felixcheun...@hotmail.com > >>>> > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Are we proposing some interpreters to be built and released > >>>> separately? > >>>> > > >>>> > Is this going to be separate packaging? Or separate release > pipeline? > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > _____________________________ > >>>> > From: Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com<mailto:jongy...@gmail.com > >>>> <jongy...@gmail.com>>> > >>>> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:04 PM > >>>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reducing default interpreters while building and > >>>> > releasing Zeppelin > >>>> > >>> > To: dev <d...@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:d...@zeppelin.apache.org > >>>> <d...@zeppelin.apache.org>>>, < > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > users@zeppelin.apache.org<mailto:users@zeppelin.apache.org > >>>> <users@zeppelin.apache.org>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > Hi dev and users, > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > Recently, zeppelin.apache.org<http://zeppelin.apache.org> is being > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > changed for increasing user experiences and convenience. I like this > >>>> kind > >>>> > of changes. I, however, saw some arguments that which interpreters > we > >>>> will > >>>> > locate in the first page. I'd like to expand its argument to the > >>>> package we > >>>> > release. > >>>> > > >>>> > Current zeppelin packages exceed 700MB with default option because > >>>> > Zeppelin tried to include all interpreters by default. It was good > at > >>>> the > >>>> > early age but, nowadays, Zeppelin community suffer from the size > >>>> because > >>>> > ASF infra allows the package size under 500MB. So I'd like to reduce > >>>> the > >>>> > package size by reducing default packages. > >>>> > > >>>> > In case of rebuilding homepage, community proposed some criteria > >>>> including > >>>> > mailing list and # of question in stackoverflow. I think we can > adapt > >>>> same > >>>> > criteria into release version of Zeppelin. > >>>> > > >>>> > To handle this kind of issue, I think consensus of community is the > >>>> most > >>>> > important factor. If someone wants to have an idea to deal with it, > >>>> please > >>>> > feel free to talk about it. > >>>> > > >>>> > Thanks, > >>>> > Jongyoul Lee > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > >>>> > http://madeng.net > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > >>>> http://madeng.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > -- > > 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 > > http://madeng.net > > > -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
