-----Original Message-----
From: G. Stanley Doore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:48
To: Bill Potts
Subject: Re: [USMA:23959] RE: Reply from the Washington Post


Sorry.  I thought I did.  Please forward this to the USMA List.  I guess I
don't have access to that list.

The Metric Editorial Guide produced by the American National Metric Council
would be a good start.  It is concise, handy and  readable which the public
can understand.  The more technical guide is the ASTM Metric Practice Guide
E-380 which could be used by professionals.  It too is handy but not pocket
size like the ANMC guide.  The USMA 8 x 11" is not as handy as these two
guides.

Regards,  Stan Doore

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: G. Stanley Doore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: [USMA:23959] RE: Reply from the Washington Post


> Which one?
>
> Bill Potts
>
> P.S. Why didn't you post your reply to the USMA List?
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: G. Stanley Doore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 04:05
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [USMA:23959] RE: Reply from the Washington Post
> >
> >
> >Refer to the SI Metric Practice Style Guide.  Stan
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Bill Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:18 PM
> >Subject: [USMA:23959] RE: Reply from the Washington Post
> >
> >
> >> The SI derived unit (not "derivative") for pressure is pascal (Pa).
Hecto
> >> and kilo are both valid prefixes. There is nothing I know of in SI that
> >> states a preference for kilopascals over hectopascals.
> >>
> >> Various disciplines do have their preferences, though. Although
> >kilopascal
> >> is preferred for things like tire pressure, meteorologists seem to be
> >split
> >> between kilopascals and hectopascals -- with the latter having the
> >> convenience of having the same value as the more traditional millibar.
> >>
> >> Bill Potts, CMS
> >> Roseville, CA
> >> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> >> >Behalf Of G. Stanley Doore
> >> >Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 14:09
> >> >To: U.S. Metric Association
> >> >Subject: [USMA:23958] RE: Reply from the Washington Post
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >It's all well and good to try to get the media to use the SI.
> >> >
> >> >Until the US Government decides that SI and its preferred
> >> >derivatives should
> >> >be used in the public arena, you will not make much progress.  The
NOAA
> >> >National Weather Service won't even adhere to the SI derivative for
> >> >pressure.  For example, the NWS uses hPa rather than kPa for pressure
> >> >Canada uses kPa to be consistent with other industries in reporting
> >> >atmospheric pressure..
> >> >
> >> >Regards,  Stan Doore
> >> >
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >From: Stephen C. Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:10 AM
> >> >Subject: [USMA:23951] RE: Reply from the Washington Post
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Terry Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> Sent: 13 December 2002 08:00
> >> >> Subject: [USMA:23949] RE: Reply from the Washington Post
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > Stephen C. Gallagher wrote:
> >> >> > > I sent a letter to the Washington Post, simply thanking them
> >> >> > > for choosing to display Celsius temperature on their website.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Here is the reply I received today:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I also wrote congratulating them and received the identical reply.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Good.  It's important to give them positive feedback.
> >They've probably
> >> >> gotten a few negative replies from the anti-metric crowd, so
whatever
> >> >> positive feedback they receive will help balance the scales.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to