Thanks Pat.
    The list I saw was about quantities and energy in various foods in the SI 
and not global warming.  It was a list of about  30 or so foods.  Very neat 
list without  text.
Regards,  Stan Doore

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Pat Naughtin 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Cc: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:26 PM
  Subject: [USMA:39859] Re: SI Energy units list in lieu of calories for food


  On 2007/12/05, at 4:43 AM, STANLEY DOORE wrote:


        About a year ago someone provided a long list of energy units for 
quantities of food in SI rather than in calories.
        Would you please send that list to me  so I may recommend its use?
    Regards,  Stan Doore



  Dear Stan,


  I published a list of 93 energy measuring words as part of my article, 'A 
word about global warming' see: 
http://www.metricationmatters.com/docs/AWordAboutGlobalWarming.pdf 


  My list included all of the various calories and Calories that I found 
calibrated to different temperatures as the measurement of heat energy in food 
is temperature dependent. British Thermal Units and Calories share this problem


  Here is an extract:


  When I searched for the ways people describe energy use, I quickly found lots 
of different words that purport to describe amounts of energy. However, I doubt 
that my searching did little more than scratch the surface. Here are 93 energy 
names that I have collected so far:
  Old pre-metric, early metric, and mongrel energy units
  Atomic energy unit, barrel oil equivalent, Billion electron volts, British 
thermal unit (0 °C), British thermal unit (16 °C), British thermal unit (20 
°C), British thermal unit (32 °F), British thermal unit (4 °C), British thermal 
unit (60 °F), British thermal unit (68 °F), British thermal unit 
(international), British thermal unit (ISO), British thermal unit (IT), British 
thermal unit (mean), British thermal unit (thermal), British thermal unit 
(thermochemical), calorie, Calorie, calorie (16 °C), Calorie (16 °C), calorie 
(20 °C), Calorie (20 °C), calorie (4 °C), Calorie (4 °C), calorie (diet 
calorie), Calorie (diet kilocalorie), calorie (int.), Calorie (int.), calorie 
(IT), calorie (International Steam Table), Calorie (it), Calorie (international 
steam table) , calorie (mean), Calorie (mean), calorie (thermochemical), 
Calorie (thermochemical), calorie (USA Customary), Calorie (USA Customary), 
Celsius heat unit (int.), coulomb volt, cubic centimetre atmospheres, cubic 
foot atmospheres, cubic meter atmospheres, dutys, dyne centimetres, electron 
volt, erg, foot-grains, foot-pound force, foot-poundal, gigaelectronvolt, gram 
calorie, gram calories (mean), hartree, horsepower hours, horsepower hours 
(metric), inch pound force, Kayser, kilo, kilocalorie (16 °C), kilocalorie (16 
°C), kilocalorie (20 °C), kilocalorie (4 °C), kilocalorie (4 °C), kilocalorie 
(diet kilocalorie), kilocalorie (int.), kilocalorie (int.), kilocalorie (IT) 
(International Steam Table) , kilocalorie (mean), kilocalorie (thermochemical), 
kiloelectronvolt, kilogram calories (int.), kilogram force meter, kiloton TNT 
equivalent, kilowatt hour, kilowatt minute, kilowatt second, megaelectronvolt, 
megaton TNT equivalent, megawatt hours, newton meter, newton meters, Q unit, 
quadrillion, quad, Rydberg, therm (EC), therm (US), thermie (16 °C), ton TNT 
equivalent, tonne coal equivalent, tonne oil equivalent, watt hour.

  I am aware, by the way, that some of these are actually equivalent to each 
other. For example, I think that a Rydberg is equivalent to a Kayser, but I 
doubt that this equivalence would be intuitive to many of our politicians.


  But what is even more concerning is that when converting from one to another, 
all these different energy words also require thousands of conversion factors 
if energy issues are to be understood at even a basic level. The 93 measures 
above require 8556 conversion factors to convert from any one measure to any 
other.


  Remember, in the International System of Units (SI) there is only one unit 
for energy:
  joule

  Therefore conversion factors are not necessary — there aren't any. 


  The joule was first established as the international unit for heat and other 
forms of energy in 1889. It is the only unit recognised for all forms of energy 
in the International System of Units (SI) since then.


  Since a joule is a relatively small amount of energy, it is usual to describe 
larger amounts using the SI prefixes. Here is the complete list of those in use:
  joules, kilojoules, megajoules, gigajoules, terajoules,

  petajoules, exajoules, zettajoules, and yottajoules.

  Given the nature of this linguistic problem how can we, as a nation or as a 
world community, sensibly discuss energy issues when we don't know what other 
people in other industries and in other nations are talking about?


  Cheers,

  Pat Naughtin


  PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
  Geelong, Australia
  Phone: 61 3 5241 2008

  Pat Naughtin helps people understand how to go about their metrication 
upgrade– quickly and easily – by helping them avoid mistakes that he has made 
himself, or that he has seen made by others during his more than 35 years of 
involvement with metrication matters. Contact Pat at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Pat specialises in the modern metric system based on the International System 
of Units (SI), but he is mostly concerned with the processes that people use 
for themselves, their groups, their businesses, their industries, and their 
nations as they go about their inevitable metrication process. See: 
http://www.metricationmatters.com/
  Pat Naughtin is a highly knowledgeable metric enthusiast, who is also a 
writer, professional speaker, editor, and publisher. He spoke in many places in 
the USA in 2005 and his most recent speaking tour, in 2007, included Singapore, 
Paris, London, Toronto, Washington, Tennessee, Colorado, Idaho, San Francisco, 
and Los Angeles. Recent clients have been the United Kingdom Metric 
Association, The Canadian Metric Association, the United States Metric 
Association, NIST in Washington, Google in San Francisco, and NASA in Los 
Angeles.





Reply via email to