Agreed! Let's drop the subject of spelling *concurrent* with proper respect for
well established laws and practices in the USA which *do not contradict SI*; 
which include USMA Web Pages.

Please cease and desist addressing messages to the USMA which deviate from the 
official USA spellings (US Government Printing Office) meter and liter.

Gene.

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:28 -0600
>From: "Paul Trusten" <[email protected]>  
>Subject: [USMA:49678] Re: [SI] A mole hill into Himalaya  
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>
>   I agree with you, Stan.  Actually, it is difficult
>   to get much of the world, let alone the U.S., to use
>   the correct SI symbols, let along some kind of
>   standardized spelling, for unit names.  For me, it
>   is the use of the established symbols that must
>   remain the same in all languages. I'm not tooting my
>   own horn, but merely stating fact, that the
>   pharmaceutical industry seems to be the
>   most consistent user of correct SI symbolism on its
>   product labels. It's afte the drug leaves the stock
>   packaging that things go down hill.
>    
>    I shall not hold it against my fellow citizens of
>   they write meter instead of metre. This spelling
>   convention never made it into U.S. English. It is
>   reflected in the spelling of other words, such as
>   center vs. centre,   or theater vs. theatre. There
>   are other spellings that became part of U.S. usage,
>   such as -or (U.S.) vs. -our (other countries) 
>   (colour, flavour, valour).  In some words of
>   science, we have sulfate vs. sulphate,  and diarrhea
>   vs. diarrhoea.   I do use, and support, the
>   pronunciation of KILL-oh-mee-ter because it is a
>   logical extension of the pronunciation of unit names
>   with SI prefixes. But, that's just I.
>    
>   As for me, I am done posting anything about this
>   again,.  It is a little known codicil in the mission
>   of USMA that we exist to
>    
>   Unite the efforts of all individuals and
>   organizations interested in promoting the metric
>   system.
>    
>   Let's drop all the trivia, stand together for world
>   metrication, and keep our eyes on that prize!
>    
>   (A mole into a Himalaya is right!)
>    
>   Paul
>    
>   Paul Trusten, R.Ph. , Vice President
>   U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
>   www.metric.org
>   [email protected]
>   +1(432)528-8824
>    
>    
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Stanislav Jakuba
>     To: [email protected]
>     Sent: 29 January, 2011 08:38
>     Subject: [SI] A mole hill into Himalaya
>
>     I cannot but show my discomfiture at the enduring
>     importance given to this –er –re non-issue.
>     Americans must be the laughing stock of anyone who
>     speaks other languages. None have this
>     “problem.” European languages, except English,
>     are (more or less) phonetic, and many other
>     languages do not bather writing vowels in the
>     first place, let along the silent ones like the
>     irritating “e.” This debate is an American
>     specialty as other English speaking countries
>     including such as India use –re or do not care.
>     Slavic languages, for example, have 6 or 7 ways to
>     spell the name. This smear on American reputation
>     as a get-things-done-country could be ignored if
>     it was not one of the reasons for the failure of
>     the Metric Board to get the changeover going back
>     in the 1970s. That mole hill issue on the
>     Himalayan scale of metricating a country should
>     have been treated as follows:
>
>      
>
>     “Mr. Chairman, I would like us to decide the
>     issue of spelling …”
>
>     A reply:
>
>     “Mr. Irritant, you or anyone else can spell it
>     anyway you want. Let’s move to the next item on
>     the agenda - a review of the report on structural
>     steel sizes and deadlines the steal industry
>     propose.”
>
>     (A subcommittee reports.)
>
>     Etc.
>
>      
>
>     It is a reflection on the poor quality of the
>     Board members that they would let themselves be
>     occupied by such a triviality. It is also a
>     reflection on this Forum, that there are people on
>     it still insisting on spelling one way or another
>     knowing well what harm treating that issue as Y/N
>     caused. As if there were no other words in the
>     American English that can be spelled more than one
>     way.
>
>     Stan Jakuba


Reply via email to