Thanks, Gene! 

Let's hope the FTC does the right thing and issues that ruling. What a great 
step forward that would be. (And too bad for the FMI, eh? ;-) 

Ezra 

----- Original Message -----

From: "eugene a mechtly" <[email protected]> 
To: "USMA" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:41:47 PM 
Subject: [USMA:54204] FW: Comments to FTC from the NCWM & NIST 







Eugene Mechtly 

From: Butcher, Kenneth S. [[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:27 AM 
To: mechtly, eugene a 
Cc: Gentry, Elizabeth; Hockert, Carol; Warfield, Lisa; Sefcik, David; 
'[email protected]'; Mark Henschel 
Subject: Comments to FTC from the NCWM & NIST 



Mr. Mechtly 



Attached is a PDF of the comments the National Conference on Weights and 
Measures submitted to the FTC regarding their regulatory review of the Fair 
Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) that you requested. Please see comment Number 
5 which encourages FTC to consider allowing metric only labeling under its 
rulemaking authority. NIST worked closely with the NCWM to prepare and submit 
the comments. The FTC was already well aware that both the NIST and the NCWM 
have supported voluntary metric only labeling since 1999 when the Uniform 
Packaging and Labeling Regulation in NIST Handbook 130 was amended. This URL 
will take you to the NIST Handbook 130: 
http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/pubs/hb130-14.cfm This URL will take you to the 
proposed amendment to FPLA to permit metric only label: 
http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/metric/pack-lab.cfm . Copies of both publications 
have been given to FTC. 



Ken Butcher 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Office of Weights and Measures 

Reply via email to