On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:20 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW, I also agree that this BCP ought not address OS, but I > very much disagree with the "can of worms" tone. But we will > need to debate the pros and cons of OS later on in various > contexts so I hope folks don't get into it right now. Let's > get this BCP done and out the door.
I strongly disagree with not addressing OE here. This BCP has one shot at getting attention, and ignoring OE now makes it look like OE is still not ready to be addressed. Let's not miss the opportunity to say "TLS works great with full authentication (here's how) and works great in opportunistic mode (here's how)". --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
