On 22/10/14 16:49, Paul Hoffman wrote: > I strongly disagree with not addressing OE here. This BCP has one > shot at getting attention, and ignoring OE now makes it look like OE > is still not ready to be addressed. Let's not miss the opportunity to > say "TLS works great with full authentication (here's how) and works > great in opportunistic mode (here's how)".
That's entirely defensible but fwiw I disagree myself, and I think equally (or more:-) defensibly. I don't think that BCP-like text for OS is as easy to get done is you seem to believe and I also think this WG has been a year on the go already and it's past time to get the basic BCP out. S. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
