> On 1 Apr 2016, at 22:48, Chris Newman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m open to proposals to advertise reporting information separately from (or > together with) SMTP security policy and to provide a mechanism to report SMTP > security without requiring SMTP security policy to be present. Given the > interest in reporting for a broad range of SMTP relay security features, we > might want to split the reporting function into a separate document.
I think having reporting in a separate document makes sense. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
