On 04/04/16 13:01, Jim Fenton wrote: > On 4/4/16 3:14 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote: >> On 01/04/16 23:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:48:00PM -0300, Chris Newman wrote: >>>> I feel very strongly that policy for SMTP relay should be advertised by >>>> SMTP and protected by SMTP TLS. >>> Unfortunately, in MTA-to-MTA SMTP, the receiving SMTP server has >>> no idea what domain the sending SMTP client wants to deliver mail >>> to at the time that it advertises its ESMTP extensions in the EHLO >>> response. >> Why must it be done then? Why not at RCPT TO time, via some suitable >> response? > > It's not even possible at RCPT TO time, for example if the message is > being forwarded.
Has been forwarded, and the RCPT is post-forwarding? Rules for the current recipient apply. Is about to be forwarded, and the RCPT is pre-forwarding? Rules for the current recipient apply. I don't see your point; please elucidate? -- Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
