Hey Mark, * Mark Risher <[email protected]> [04/04/2016 23:49:55] wrote: > This is cool. How far along is it? One issue we ran into with > STARTTLS-Everywhere was where it would be hosted.
We're just starting (April). We've had a few video-calls that were a mix of organizing and hackathon fixing trivial open issues, PRs and reading up/documenting on what's changed TLS-wise in mail daemon software over the years. I'll start working considerably more on the project this month, hopefully we'll have more to show in the near future. > This is similar to what we were discussing with Certificate > Transparency, > i.e. some sort of append-only log for policies published and > policies > discovered. I was actually also thinking of distributed append-only logs. I'm open to collaborate on that, would be very useful to us. git has been suggested as a (maybe temporary) distribution platform, but I'd prefer a solid design with distributed append-only logs. > More like the latter. We've been discussing with the CT folks how > it could > be extended for DV certs, what extensions would be needed, and > whether to > allow self-signed. We moved that to "Future Work" so as not to > derail the > short-term, and because someone recommended against writing a > draft that > depends on another draft, but it remains an interesting > alternative > solution to the cryptographically-secure distributed hashtable > problem. Yes, very interesting. Please keep me in the loop if that's OK with you guys, might also be something that should (for now) be discussed off-list? The STS suggested error-reporting feature is something that makes sense as a seperate draft, as others could use it for different/ augmented data as well if spec'd in the right way. I'm open to collaborate and will have (finally!) more time for all that email related stuff now. Thanks, Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
