On 4/4/16 3:14 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 01/04/16 23:18, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:48:00PM -0300, Chris Newman wrote: >>> I feel very strongly that policy for SMTP relay should be advertised by >>> SMTP and protected by SMTP TLS. >> Unfortunately, in MTA-to-MTA SMTP, the receiving SMTP server has >> no idea what domain the sending SMTP client wants to deliver mail >> to at the time that it advertises its ESMTP extensions in the EHLO >> response. > Why must it be done then? Why not at RCPT TO time, via some suitable > response?
It's not even possible at RCPT TO time, for example if the message is being forwarded. -Jim _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
