On 2014/08/27 10:42:31, rossberg wrote:
On 2014/08/27 09:57:37, dcarney (ooto) wrote:
> rossberg@ : what would you think of passing a struct containing all the
> callbacks to SetNamedPropertyHandler?
> It turns out we have a use case for having a GetNamedPropertyHandler
method,
and
> the struct would be ideal for that.
>
> see https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=404300#c20
I think grouping them into a struct makes a lot of sense!
Agreed wrt a struct making sense, but isn't it reasonable to also have an
old-style API? (Just trying to limit the scope of this patchset, as it
touches
runtime stuff and i have to keep rebasing that.)
https://codereview.chromium.org/467013003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
