On 2011/08/26 22:29:05, Vitaly Repeshko wrote:
LGTM
http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc File src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode5444
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:5444: __ nop(0); // Jumping as first instructionwould crash the code generation. Is this a bug?
http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc File src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode3415
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:3415: STATIC_ASSERT((kConsStringTag < kExternalStringTag));Why do we need extra () here? If the assert macro requires them, let's fix themacro.
Those two issues are addressed by http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1644 and http://codereview.chromium.org/7776007/ http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/ -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
