On 2011/08/26 22:29:05, Vitaly Repeshko wrote:
LGTM

http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc
File src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc (right):


http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc#newcode5444
src/arm/code-stubs-arm.cc:5444: __ nop(0); // Jumping as first instruction
would crash the code generation.
Is this a bug?

http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc
File src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc (right):


http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/diff/62001/src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc#newcode3415
src/ia32/code-stubs-ia32.cc:3415: STATIC_ASSERT((kConsStringTag <
kExternalStringTag));
Why do we need extra () here? If the assert macro requires them, let's fix the
macro.

Those two issues are addressed by
http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=1644
and
http://codereview.chromium.org/7776007/


http://codereview.chromium.org/7477045/

--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev

Reply via email to