Looks good. Rodolph, would you like to take a look too?
https://codereview.chromium.org/16109010/diff/1/src/atomicops_internals_arm_gcc.h
File src/atomicops_internals_arm_gcc.h (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/16109010/diff/1/src/atomicops_internals_arm_gcc.h#newcode260
src/atomicops_internals_arm_gcc.h:260: // which always implement a full
barrier.
If NoBarrier_CompareAndSwap returns early because of (prev_value !=
old_value) then we will not emit barrier. Is this correct because we
care only about the store operation not being reordered?
https://codereview.chromium.org/16109010/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
