In my experience setups defining multiple storages are few and they use them explicitly (in VCL).
While I'm not necessarily advocating this change I think this will be closer to how someone would expect it to work. Waiting for the next major release and documenting the change might do the trick. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > -------- > In message <CAJV_h0baK40Nf=r5t7TRZTTpOiVQ8jJrkKuCjxrYYkD2LKO7qA@mail. > gmail.com> > , Federico Schwindt writes: > > >Why? Is there anyone depending on this feature? > > Pretty much anyone with two -s arguments are, and they probably dont know > it. > > >Wouldn't be easier to visualise and/or explain what is going where if it's > >done explicitly? > > This doesn't preclude doing it explicitly, it merely maintains existing > configs working. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
