OK, all makes sense now. I will work on the PR.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > -------- > In message <CAJV_h0YEqgoh9b+qrBVW05CeRezr0Etq5Zkv8y4n19OxT > [email protected]> > , Federico Schwindt writes: > > >In other words, for cache insertions default / no setting means RR and > NULL > >means failure? > > yes. > > >I believe that'd work. > > >About this: > > > >> If at the end of v_b_r{} beresp->storage is non-NULL, we use that > stevedore > >and only that stevedore. > > > >If someone sets the wrong storage, because e.g. they had a typo, we will > >fail the request or fallback to Transient? > > beresp->storage is typed and type-checked, so if you have a typo, > the compiler complains unless you happen to name one of your other > stevedores with the typo. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
