Regardless of the RR, any comments or guidelines to move this forward? Should we stick to the _hint and gc in the next major release?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Federico Schwindt <fg...@lodoss.net> wrote: > In my experience setups defining multiple storages are few and they use > them explicitly (in VCL). > > While I'm not necessarily advocating this change I think this will be > closer to how someone would expect it to work. > Waiting for the next major release and documenting the change might do the > trick. > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> > wrote: > >> -------- >> In message <CAJV_h0baK40Nf=r5t7trzttpoivq8jjrkkucjxryykd2lko...@mail.gm >> ail.com> >> , Federico Schwindt writes: >> >> >Why? Is there anyone depending on this feature? >> >> Pretty much anyone with two -s arguments are, and they probably dont know >> it. >> >> >Wouldn't be easier to visualise and/or explain what is going where if >> it's >> >done explicitly? >> >> This doesn't preclude doing it explicitly, it merely maintains existing >> configs working. >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >> p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >> incompetence. >> > >
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
