Hi, On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 09:24:18PM +0100, James Harrison wrote: > > > > > Good to know. There's more than just that one bug, though - just had > > an hourlong site outage due to varnish's child just up and dying and > > not being restarted. Wouldn't know where to look for debug output - > > restarted the parent and it worked again for about 3 minutes and then > > the child didn't die but it did stop servicing requests. New requests > > would be accepted, and held open, but nothing happened subsequently. > > > > Just downgraded to 3.0 and everything's working again. Persistent > > storage is a nice-to-have to avoid cold caches after restarts/crashes, > > but 4.0 clearly needs some work before it goes anywhere near production. > > It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is still > experimental, just as it was in 3.0. > Experimental is misleading, it makes it sound like the code has a future. I think the persistence code is still there because nobody has bothered disabling it yet. There is no work being done on the persistent. I doubt someone will pick it up. -- <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer* CTO | Varnish Software Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer We Make Websites Fly! Winner of the Red Herring Top 100 Global Award 2013
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
