Interesting... Doe the site say the persistent store is deprecated/unmaintained? That explains the periodic crashes I get.. ( I'll resuscitate the ticket i had created some months anyway...) Cheers, On 19/05/2014 5:12 pm, "Per Buer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 09:24:18PM +0100, James Harrison wrote: >> > > >> > Good to know. There's more than just that one bug, though - just had >> > an hourlong site outage due to varnish's child just up and dying and >> > not being restarted. Wouldn't know where to look for debug output - >> > restarted the parent and it worked again for about 3 minutes and then >> > the child didn't die but it did stop servicing requests. New requests >> > would be accepted, and held open, but nothing happened subsequently. >> > >> > Just downgraded to 3.0 and everything's working again. Persistent >> > storage is a nice-to-have to avoid cold caches after restarts/crashes, >> > but 4.0 clearly needs some work before it goes anywhere near production. >> >> It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is still >> experimental, just as it was in 3.0. >> > > Experimental is misleading, it makes it sound like the code has a future. > I think the persistence code is still there because nobody has bothered > disabling it yet. > > There is no work being done on the persistent. I doubt someone will pick > it up. > > -- > <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer* > CTO | Varnish Software > Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer > We Make Websites Fly! > > Winner of the Red Herring Top 100 Global Award 2013 > > > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
