On 19/05/14 07:54, Andreas Plesner Jacobsen wrote: > It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is > still experimental, just as it was in 3.0.
Upgraded to be on the current latest stable maintained build, not to use persistent. I like to do upgrades in a controlled manner while the old version is still viable so finding bugs isn't catastrophic! Persistent I only switched to when it was clear to work around the thread issue I was going to be restarting the thing a lot till a fix got issued/I had time to build from source to see if that commit fixed it. If the persistent storage is broken/dodgy to the extent it was causing the whole thing to lock up and die then it shouldn't be in the release imho. Experimental is certainly the wrong wording - deprecated, perhaps? I'll try again when >4.0.0 is out with a fix for the thread pool issue and see how things work using the usual transient memory store. -- Cheers, James _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
