On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:09:58AM +0200, Per Buer wrote: > > > > > > Just downgraded to 3.0 and everything's working again. Persistent > > > storage is a nice-to-have to avoid cold caches after restarts/crashes, > > > but 4.0 clearly needs some work before it goes anywhere near production. > > > > It sounds like you've upgraded to get persistent? Persistent is still > > experimental, just as it was in 3.0. > > > > Experimental is misleading, it makes it sound like the code has a future. I > think the persistence code is still there because nobody has bothered > disabling it yet. > > There is no work being done on the persistent. I doubt someone will pick it > up.
True. My point was mostly that I would expect persistent to act just as bad in 3.0 as in 4.0, so it should never be the reason for upgrading. -- Andreas _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
