Sorry, I didn't get your question. -- Guillaume Quintard
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Guillaume. May be Im asking a very basic question , but still how > this short lived objects are created and I'm not giving any settings for > the same as well. > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Quintard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnishd.html#shortlived >> >> On Sep 6, 2016 08:07, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Guillaume. I will try the transient settings first and verify >>> the same. Also could you please elaborate on the short lived objects. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Sujith P V >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Viktor, >>>> >>>> Have a look here https://www.varnish-cache >>>> .org/docs/trunk/users-guide/storage-backends.html#transient-storage >>>> >>>> Sujith, please try to use a packaged version from your distribution. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Viktor Villafuerte < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>> >>>>> On Thu 01 Sep 2016 09:53:22, Guillaume Quintard wrote: >>>>> > Is that virtual or real memory? >>>>> > Try to cap your Transient storage to 1GB, you may be overloaded with >>>>> short >>>>> > lived objects. >>>>> >>>>> Could you elaborate on this bit more? I've got very similar problem >>>>> here. Eg: Total memory 384g >>>>> >>>>> VIRT: 487g >>>>> RES: 311g >>>>> >>>>> free says: 46g free >>>>> >>>>> but SWAP is 91.3% used :( >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How can this be? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> >>>>> v >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sep 1, 2016 9:40 AM, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Hi All >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I had already mailed this query long back but this time putting in >>>>> a >>>>> > > different manner. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > - We are using Varnish 4.0 in our end. We have a machine with >>>>> memory >>>>> > > of 16G with 8G being malloc for Varnish. We have a TTL for 2 >>>>> hrs as well. >>>>> > > - During our peak traffic, when we see the total memory of the >>>>> machine >>>>> > > reaching 90% and like varnishd process is taking some 89% . >>>>> > > - So I'm just confused even though we had allocated just 8G >>>>> malloc >>>>> > > which is like 50% of the total memory, how the process is >>>>> eating up 89% of >>>>> > > memory and the memory is not releasing even after TTL. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Any help please... >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Best Regards >>>>> > > Sujith P V >>>>> > > >>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Viktor Villafuerte >>>>> Optus Internet Engineering >>>>> t: +61 2 80825265 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
