What about the other g_space/g_bytes? On Sep 14, 2016 18:33, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It was showing as 0 for Transient_g_bytes and 1Gb for g_space as I > mentioned in my mail. > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Guillaume Quintard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> please keep using the mailing list, some other people may have ideas. >> >> what's the output of "varnishstat -1 | grep g_bytes" ? >> >> -- >> Guillaume Quintard >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Guillaume >>> >>> I have tried capping Transient and I could see the respective values >>> under SMA.transient.g_bytes/g_space. But still on load I didnt see this >>> g_bytes being used and was showing 0 only. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Sujith P V >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe, not sure. Unless you have a **good** reason to do so, use the >>>> packages. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Guillaume. Actually in my end Varnish was compiled here and >>>>> installed (I was not part of that initially :-)). Will this have any >>>>> impact >>>>> compared to as you have mentioned like try from a packaged version. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's just a question of storage, shortlive objects got into transient >>>>>> storage instead of the one(s) you defined in the command line. But it's >>>>>> still a cache storage, based on malloc, that is by default unlimited in >>>>>> size. >>>>>> >>>>>> The rationale is that for object with such short ttl+grace+keep, a >>>>>> simple malloc is good enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:04 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually I'm confused around the short lived objects. Is these >>>>>>> objects are something like cached objects or who is creating these >>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't get your question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. May be Im asking a very basic question , but >>>>>>>>> still how this short lived objects are created and I'm not giving any >>>>>>>>> settings for the same as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnishd.ht >>>>>>>>>> ml#shortlived >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2016 08:07, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. I will try the transient settings first and >>>>>>>>>>> verify the same. Also could you please elaborate on the short lived >>>>>>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>> Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Viktor, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look here https://www.varnish-cache >>>>>>>>>>>> .org/docs/trunk/users-guide/storage-backends.html#transient- >>>>>>>>>>>> storage >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sujith, please try to use a packaged version from your >>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Viktor Villafuerte < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu 01 Sep 2016 09:53:22, Guillaume Quintard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > Is that virtual or real memory? >>>>>>>>>>>>> > Try to cap your Transient storage to 1GB, you may be >>>>>>>>>>>>> overloaded with short >>>>>>>>>>>>> > lived objects. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you elaborate on this bit more? I've got very similar >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>> here. Eg: Total memory 384g >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> VIRT: 487g >>>>>>>>>>>>> RES: 311g >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> free says: 46g free >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but SWAP is 91.3% used :( >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How can this be? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> v >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sep 1, 2016 9:40 AM, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Hi All >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I had already mailed this query long back but this time >>>>>>>>>>>>> putting in a >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > different manner. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - We are using Varnish 4.0 in our end. We have a >>>>>>>>>>>>> machine with memory >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > of 16G with 8G being malloc for Varnish. We have a TTL >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 2 hrs as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - During our peak traffic, when we see the total memory >>>>>>>>>>>>> of the machine >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > reaching 90% and like varnishd process is taking some >>>>>>>>>>>>> 89% . >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - So I'm just confused even though we had allocated >>>>>>>>>>>>> just 8G malloc >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > which is like 50% of the total memory, how the process >>>>>>>>>>>>> is eating up 89% of >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > memory and the memory is not releasing even after TTL. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Any help please... >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish >>>>>>>>>>>>> -misc >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Viktor Villafuerte >>>>>>>>>>>>> Optus Internet Engineering >>>>>>>>>>>>> t: +61 2 80825265 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
