Have you tried the packages from your distribution? On Sep 14, 2016 20:09, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote:
> After the full load of requests..g_space became minimal and g_bytes became > like 8 Gb..I had assigned malloc as 8 gb > > On 14-Sep-2016 22:42, "Guillaume Quintard" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What about the other g_space/g_bytes? >> >> On Sep 14, 2016 18:33, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It was showing as 0 for Transient_g_bytes and 1Gb for g_space as I >>> mentioned in my mail. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> please keep using the mailing list, some other people may have ideas. >>>> >>>> what's the output of "varnishstat -1 | grep g_bytes" ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Guillaume >>>>> >>>>> I have tried capping Transient and I could see the respective values >>>>> under SMA.transient.g_bytes/g_space. But still on load I didnt see this >>>>> g_bytes being used and was showing 0 only. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> Sujith P V >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Maybe, not sure. Unless you have a **good** reason to do so, use the >>>>>> packages. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. Actually in my end Varnish was compiled here and >>>>>>> installed (I was not part of that initially :-)). Will this have any >>>>>>> impact >>>>>>> compared to as you have mentioned like try from a packaged version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's just a question of storage, shortlive objects got into >>>>>>>> transient storage instead of the one(s) you defined in the command >>>>>>>> line. >>>>>>>> But it's still a cache storage, based on malloc, that is by default >>>>>>>> unlimited in size. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The rationale is that for object with such short ttl+grace+keep, a >>>>>>>> simple malloc is good enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:04 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually I'm confused around the short lived objects. Is these >>>>>>>>> objects are something like cached objects or who is creating these >>>>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't get your question. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. May be Im asking a very basic question , but >>>>>>>>>>> still how this short lived objects are created and I'm not giving >>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>> settings for the same as well. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnishd.ht >>>>>>>>>>>> ml#shortlived >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2016 08:07, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. I will try the transient settings first and >>>>>>>>>>>>> verify the same. Also could you please elaborate on the short >>>>>>>>>>>>> lived objects. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Viktor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look here https://www.varnish-cache >>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/docs/trunk/users-guide/storage-backends.html#transient- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> storage >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sujith, please try to use a packaged version from your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Viktor Villafuerte < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu 01 Sep 2016 09:53:22, Guillaume Quintard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Is that virtual or real memory? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Try to cap your Transient storage to 1GB, you may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overloaded with short >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > lived objects. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you elaborate on this bit more? I've got very similar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here. Eg: Total memory 384g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIRT: 487g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RES: 311g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free says: 46g free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but SWAP is 91.3% used :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can this be? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sep 1, 2016 9:40 AM, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Hi All >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I had already mailed this query long back but this time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putting in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > different manner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - We are using Varnish 4.0 in our end. We have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine with memory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > of 16G with 8G being malloc for Varnish. We have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TTL for 2 hrs as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - During our peak traffic, when we see the total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory of the machine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > reaching 90% and like varnishd process is taking some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 89% . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - So I'm just confused even though we had allocated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just 8G malloc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > which is like 50% of the total memory, how the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is eating up 89% of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > memory and the memory is not releasing even after TTL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Any help please... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Viktor Villafuerte >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Optus Internet Engineering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: +61 2 80825265 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
