That can't, hurt. On Sep 15, 2016 03:31, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote:
> No..I'm planning to try that next. So during that time also so do we need > to cap transient storage ?? > > On 15-Sep-2016 01:18, "Guillaume Quintard" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Have you tried the packages from your distribution? >> >> On Sep 14, 2016 20:09, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> After the full load of requests..g_space became minimal and g_bytes >>> became like 8 Gb..I had assigned malloc as 8 gb >>> >>> On 14-Sep-2016 22:42, "Guillaume Quintard" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What about the other g_space/g_bytes? >>>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2016 18:33, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was showing as 0 for Transient_g_bytes and 1Gb for g_space as I >>>>> mentioned in my mail. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> please keep using the mailing list, some other people may have ideas. >>>>>> >>>>>> what's the output of "varnishstat -1 | grep g_bytes" ? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Guillaume >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have tried capping Transient and I could see the respective values >>>>>>> under SMA.transient.g_bytes/g_space. But still on load I didnt see this >>>>>>> g_bytes being used and was showing 0 only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>> Sujith P V >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe, not sure. Unless you have a **good** reason to do so, use >>>>>>>> the packages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. Actually in my end Varnish was compiled here and >>>>>>>>> installed (I was not part of that initially :-)). Will this have any >>>>>>>>> impact >>>>>>>>> compared to as you have mentioned like try from a packaged version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's just a question of storage, shortlive objects got into >>>>>>>>>> transient storage instead of the one(s) you defined in the command >>>>>>>>>> line. >>>>>>>>>> But it's still a cache storage, based on malloc, that is by default >>>>>>>>>> unlimited in size. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The rationale is that for object with such short ttl+grace+keep, >>>>>>>>>> a simple malloc is good enough. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:04 PM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually I'm confused around the short lived objects. Is these >>>>>>>>>>> objects are something like cached objects or who is creating these >>>>>>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I didn't get your question. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, sujith pv <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. May be Im asking a very basic question , but >>>>>>>>>>>>> still how this short lived objects are created and I'm not giving >>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>> settings for the same as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/4.1/reference/varnishd.ht >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ml#shortlived >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2016 08:07, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Guillaume. I will try the transient settings first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and verify the same. Also could you please elaborate on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short lived >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Quintard < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Viktor, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look here https://www.varnish-cache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .org/docs/trunk/users-guide/st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orage-backends.html#transient-storage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sujith, please try to use a packaged version from your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guillaume Quintard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Viktor Villafuerte < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu 01 Sep 2016 09:53:22, Guillaume Quintard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Is that virtual or real memory? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Try to cap your Transient storage to 1GB, you may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overloaded with short >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > lived objects. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you elaborate on this bit more? I've got very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> similar problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here. Eg: Total memory 384g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIRT: 487g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RES: 311g >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free says: 46g free >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but SWAP is 91.3% used :( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can this be? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sep 1, 2016 9:40 AM, "sujith pv" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Hi All >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > I had already mailed this query long back but this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time putting in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > different manner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - We are using Varnish 4.0 in our end. We have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine with memory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > of 16G with 8G being malloc for Varnish. We have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TTL for 2 hrs as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - During our peak traffic, when we see the total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> memory of the machine >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > reaching 90% and like varnishd process is taking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some 89% . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > - So I'm just confused even though we had allocated >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just 8G malloc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > which is like 50% of the total memory, how the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process is eating up 89% of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > memory and the memory is not releasing even after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TTL. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Any help please... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Sujith P V >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > varnish-misc mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://www.varnish-cache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Viktor Villafuerte >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Optus Internet Engineering >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t: +61 2 80825265 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
