On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 10:55, Nick Harring wrote:
> We currently run our hosted systems requiring reverse DNS and haven't
> really had any complaints about mail not being received. While there's
> no rule requiring reverse DNS, systems without it are much more likely
> to be spam originators in my experience with our system. The few
> systems I've come across that legitimately send mail but had broken
> reverse DNS were more than happy, and able, to fix it quickly and
> understood immediately the point of rejecting connections on such a
> condition.

If you've chosen to deliberately break your mail server like this, that
is of course your choice to make.  I just hope you've informed your
customers.

- Ron



Reply via email to