At 08:12 AM 03-27-2003, Ron Guerin wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 11:05, Nick Harring wrote:

> Rather than questioning why we would refuse to accept from
> non-reversible hosts, why don't we ask why anyone would set a host up
> without reverse DNS?

Rather than question why you've deliberately broken your mail server, I
should explain to you why some people running legit servers don't comply
with your arbitrary requirements?

A better question is why I'm wasting my time trying to explain things to
someone who top-posts and sends HTML to mailing lists.

rather than trumping up your argument with etiquette fascism, how about pointing out a relevant RFC that backs up your [baseless] opinion that a mailserver must accept messages from a site without reverse DNS?

ever heard of RFC 2505? apparently not.

Paul Theodoropoulos
The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net

Reply via email to