It might be as simple as changing the two "5" entries to "0"
which from your listing below looks like the level_index0 and the_dir columns

Ken Jones

On Friday 25 June 2004 11:23 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> sooo - nobody knows where the directory 'incrementer' lives? Tom? i have no
> fix? i'm stuck with going from
>
> /u1/domains/0/abc.com   to
> /u1/domains/5/def.com
>
> ?? no way to get the system to resume creating new domains under the more
> logical /u1/domains/1/def.com?
>
> i mean, yeah - i can live with it. it's not affecting actual functionality.
>
> At 12:16 PM 6/23/2004, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> >well, now it's incremented up to '5'. eesh. what i've found in perusing
> >the mysql backend db, is the following:
> >
> >mysql> select * from dir_control where domain = 'dom_89';
> >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+-------------
> >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+-----
> >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------
> >-+
> >
> >| domain | cur_users | level_cur | level_max | level_start0 | level_start1
> >| level_start2 | level_end0 | level_end1 | level_end2 | level_mod0 |
> >
> >level_mod1 | level_mod2 | level_index0 | level_index1 | level_index2 |
> >the_dir |
> >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+-------------
> >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+-----
> >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------
> >-+
> >
> >| dom_89 |       201 |         0 |         3 |            0 |            0
> >|            0 |         61 |         61 |         61 |          0
> >|          2 |          4 |            5 |            0 |            0 |
> >
> >5       |
> >+--------+-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+-------------
> >-+--------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+-----
> >-------+------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+--------
> >-+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
> >
> >
> >there is no domain dom_89, which suggests to me this may be the 'master
> >control' for what overflow subdirectory is to be used - it's the only
> >record that has '5' for the value 'the_dir', and '89' is the vpopmail
> > uid/gid.
> >
> >however, i'm reluctant to make changes to the record, for fear of, well,
> >duh - completely destroying my setup with one bad keystroke.
> >
> >so, if anyone can confirm my speculations, and suggest how to fix it
> >(that's right, i've never inserted data manually into a table!), i'd
> >appreciate the help.
>
> Paul Theodoropoulos
> http://www.anastrophe.com

Reply via email to