On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:20 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: > What, precisely, is gained by supporting postfix? i don't see the point.
Postfix is a MODERN sendmail replacement. Qmail is not. You don't need to patch Postfix. Patches suck. :) > At 02:45 PM 9/8/2004, you wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Michael Bowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > The perfect world would be a vpopmail mailbox management combined with > > > postfix MTA :-) > > > >Yes! I keep saying that. I had heard that there is work going on to create > >an abstraction layer between vpopmail and qmail (i.e. vpopmail functions do > >X rather than doing X with qmail). I promptly joined the development list > >but its low traffic and I don't really see a lot of those types of changes > >happening... nor do I see a well defined path layed out where anyone else > >can help to make this happen without either just doing it all themselves or > >contributing work with your fingers crossed. > > > >The main/only developers on vpopmail seem VERY fixated on qmail and for some > >reason are unwilling to work towards supporting other MTA. > > > >-Steve > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com > http://www.smileglobal.com > > > > -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net
