Yes, it does - I think there may be a slight issue with 'Delivered-To:',
but not sure what to do about it.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Ken Jones wrote:
> That sounds like a pretty good patch to me.
>
> So it completes the vpopmail .qmail file processing
> functionality to match what qmail-local supports
> including . to : character handling?
>
> Ken Jones
>
> Drew Wells wrote:
> > It extends the normal use of .qmail file to .qmail, .qmail-default,
> > .qmail-extension and .qmail-extension-default based on the remaining
> > extension on the incoming E-Mail address in the order as specified in the
> > qmail source code.
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, DAve wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Drew Wells wrote:
> >>
> >>>I have patched VpopMail 5.4.13 so that each user in a domain can have
> >>>there E-Mail handled by there own set of .qmail files (in
> >>>/var/vpopmail/domains/{domain}/{user}), this is a patch to
> >>>'int check_forward_deliver(char *dir)' in vdelivermail.c.
> >>>This means for us when we delete an E-Mail address all the special
> >>>delivery rules are also deleted (for that user).
> >>>Is this patch of any interest to anyone or is this meant to be done
> >>>another way ?
> >>>
> >>>Regards
> >>
> >>Call me crazy but I have used .qmail files in the users directory for
> >>two years with vpopmail, up to 5.4.10.
> >>
> >>How does your patch differ from vpopmails normal behavior?
> >>
> >>DAve
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
