Yep, exactly that. I am using '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and it is handled by /var/vpopmain/domains/elysium.ltd.uk/drew/.qmail-vpopmail.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, DAve wrote: > Drew Wells wrote: > > It extends the normal use of .qmail file to .qmail, .qmail-default, > > .qmail-extension and .qmail-extension-default based on the remaining > > extension on the incoming E-Mail address in the order as specified in the > > qmail source code. > > I may be slow, it's been a very long month already and I am taking a > beating this morning. You are saying that if I have an address of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I may create > > /home/vpopmail/pixelhammer.com/dave/.qmail-list > > and it will be handled correctly? > > DAve > > > > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, DAve wrote: > > > > > >>Drew Wells wrote: > >> > >>>I have patched VpopMail 5.4.13 so that each user in a domain can have > >>>there E-Mail handled by there own set of .qmail files (in > >>>/var/vpopmail/domains/{domain}/{user}), this is a patch to > >>>'int check_forward_deliver(char *dir)' in vdelivermail.c. > >>>This means for us when we delete an E-Mail address all the special > >>>delivery rules are also deleted (for that user). > >>>Is this patch of any interest to anyone or is this meant to be done > >>>another way ? > >>> > >>>Regards > >> > >>Call me crazy but I have used .qmail files in the users directory for > >>two years with vpopmail, up to 5.4.10. > >> > >>How does your patch differ from vpopmails normal behavior? > >> > >>DAve > >> > > > > > > > > > >