I agree with you.. So I hope this stays. Remo
DAve On 1/8/09 1:56 PM, "DAve" <dave.l...@pixelhammer.com> wrote: > Remo Mattei wrote: >> Are people moving to a different options? Just wonder.. And if they are what >> are those options? > > I hope not, I've not seen anything that comes close to the abilities of > vpopmail. We are preparing to completely overhaul our backend server and > integrate vpopmaild into our intranet. > > DAve > >> >> Thanks, >> Remo >> >> >> Tom Collins On 1/8/09 12:55 PM, "Tom Collins" <t...@tomlogic.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:54 AM, aledr wrote: >>>> There's a lot of patches on SourceForge tracker to be accepted and I >>>> have my own patches and improvements for vpopmail that I would like to >>>> see in the package. >>>> There's no activity on the SF CVS for months, is It in active >>>> development yet? >>> >>> It's not in active development. All of the past "lead developers" on >>> the project (including myself) have been too busy to dedicate any >>> time to it. >>> >>> Some of the patches on SourceForge won't ever go into the mainstream >>> releases (as least as far as I'm concerned), but remain available for >>> those who want to add that functionality. >>> >>> Unfortunately, doing anything with vpopmail and qmailadmin has moved >>> very far down my to do list. >>> >>> -Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > !DSPAM:496668f732671796021211!
