On 10/22/08 09:55, Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Aaron Zang <Aaron.Zang at sun.com> wrote: >> >> On 10/21/08 23:08, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >>> I am getting ready to publish test binaries of Xorg 1.5 for our >>> upcoming switch to it - can I get the source changes you made in >>> your Xorg test binary so I can include those changes in our test >>> binaries as well? >>> >> What is this Xorg 1.5 test binary for? Is it for the testing of >> official release of Xorg 1.5 in Solaris? >> So my understanding is that the test binary should include exactly >> what is or going to be in Xorg 1.5. Will the switching happen in >> build 105? I am not sure Xorg VT support would be ready for >> integration before 105. >> >> And our experimental binary is just the one we used to test the >> kernel. It's based on the assumption that virtual console support >> is available and vtdaemon service is enabled. The code needs to >> be enhanced to function well in any kind of situation, i.e. the >> system does not support virtual console or vtdaemon service is >> disabled, more importantly, dealing with the state changes >> dynamically. >> So I really do not think putting this somewhat immature code >> in your testing binary is a good idea. >> Anyway, it's up to you. >> >> Regards, >> Aaron > > > Congrats! This is good news. > Two questions: Is SPARC-support included, if so for Xorg?
For SPARC system to support virtual console in the kernel, coherent console support is a prerequisite. That means XVR-100 and XVR-300 graphic card currently. We will only add virtual console support to Xorg. > Are the src finally available now, if so are they in OS/Net? > The virtual console infrastructure is already in OS/Net since snv_100. > %martin -- You know some birds are not meant to be caged, their feathers are just too bright.
