Darren J Moffat wrote: > Riny Qian wrote: > > >>What if we do extend /dev/console meaning to include >>/dev/console and all /dev/vt# devices in this case, >>and will do that fix in later case? Is there any impact? > > > There could be but it depends on who the future case > is done. > > I would rather not overload the string "/dev/console" > to mean /dev/console and any /dev/vt#.
Okey, I take that back, and still keep that /dev/console just means the system console. I'll update the spec soon. > > What is your timescale for integration of this project ? > Maybe I can at least get a design for fixing this > area of Solaris ARC approved before your case is approved. > ARC can then decided if it is important that you depend > on it or not. >
