On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:59:07 +0100 Dieter Plaetinck <[email protected]> wrote:
> To round off: > 1) What's the idea behind autosync-server? doesn't the xmpp method work just > fine? I can answer this one myself now. the README section mentions you had the idea of using a simple tcp protocol. or "whatever sparkleshare does" (they implement a simple synchronisation protocol over irc). I thought the big advantage of xmpp was that it so robust? messages get delivered after connectivity issues etc. So I would probably stay with that. (or maybe zeroMQ is what you want: http://www.zeromq.org/intro:read-the-manual ) I have some more questions now: 3) What's the best way to package this? Where should files go? autosync.py in /usr/bin, but jabberbot.py... ? maybe /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jabberbot.py, that's where the jabberbot package installs the file on Arch Linux anyway. or maybe submit your patch upstream, so that you don't need to include a modified jabberbot.py. and it will be easier for packagers. 4) How about, in commit messages, listing all files which are affected in this commit? Dieter _______________________________________________ vcs-home mailing list [email protected] http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
