On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 08:39 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.08.1419 +0100]: > > Does this look like a worthwhile extension to the current changelog > > format? For me it makes reviewing changes a lot easier. > > I think this is very important to have, but why put them at the > front? Changelogs are for consumption by humans and machines, and > humans have it easier if they can just start reading on the left > side and get the information they want. Machines don't really care > very much. > > So, similar to how we close bugs, how about > > * fixed segfault during daemon startup (Closes: #7005180) [fed3f3d] > > instead?
You mean [fc5473a06be960382582ddbfb40e2a5f824be122] don't you? I don't think we need a VCS identifier there. I don't see why anyone would specify a bzr revision id in a git package. How would this differ from using annotate on the changelog? Do some people write the changelog at the end? Thanks, James _______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss